{"id":242,"date":"2021-03-07T16:16:28","date_gmt":"2021-03-07T16:16:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.zerochippenham.org\/?p=242"},"modified":"2023-04-23T14:31:21","modified_gmt":"2023-04-23T14:31:21","slug":"what-is-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.zerochippenham.org\/2021\/03\/07\/what-is-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Climate Change?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201c[The unchecked burning of fossil fuels] would have a sort of greenhouse effect\u201d, and \u201cThe net result is the greenhouse becomes a sort of hot-house.\u201d Alexander Graham Bell, 1917<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Bell went on to also advocate the use of alternate energy sources, such as solar energy.<\/p>\n

Zero Chippenham member: “Climate change is really the trigger that got me personally working towards sustainability, examining everything we do as a business. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) interim report landed in 2018 (3) and received wide scale publicity it was a real shock. Though I had heard of global warming and Climate Change, I wasn\u2019t aware of just how severe and far reaching the effects were likely to be, and what little time we had to act.”<\/p>\n\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n\t\t\n
\n
<\/div> \n
\n
\n \n
\n \n

The IPCC report said..<\/p>\n

Limiting global warming to 1.5\u00baC would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society assessment<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It\u2019s perhaps the far reaching nature of the changes needed to reach the 1.5 degrees goal that have produced such strong criticism from people such as US President Trump, or indeed in the comments section of newspapers such as The Times when they publish Climate Change stories. The media are partly to blame for this as they tend to latch on to certain stories or publish individual research papers out of context leading to confusion in the general public. It may also be a shock response or disbelief that what seemed to be 170 years of progress since the industrial revolution has taken us to the brink of ecological breakdown and the sixth mass extinction event.<\/p>\n

But given that 97% of scientists around the world have no doubt that man-made<\/strong><\/em> Climate change is happening (and the other three percent’s evidence has been proven flawed when other scientists have tried to recreate their experiments), and the IPCC reports are the best peer reviewed evidence we have, business as usual isn\u2019t an option.
\nThe 1.5 degrees temperature rise mentioned in the IPCC report is important as the Paris accord set a limit of 2 degrees C. Now whilst that might not seem a lot of difference, in terms of impacts on our planet it is huge.
\nI\u2019ve spent many months studying the science of Climate Change and have found the Future Learn courses run by the University of Exeter to be excellent (1). Not least because they give some hope that whilst it will be huge task, it\u2019s not insurmountable if we work together and fast.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div> \n